If walls could talk, what would Havana’s
eclectic architecture tell us? The Baroque buildings might offer a story of
Spanish colonialism, while the neoclassical could recall how French landowners
arrived in the early 19th century fleeing Haiti after a slave uprising. Meanwhile
buildings infused with a mix of Art Nouveau and Art Deco could offer many tales
from the period when the Cuban capital was once considered one of the finest
cities in Latin America, as sugar barons rivalled each other to build
ostentatious mansions.
But these iconic architectural tropes from
Cuba’s colonial and first republic periods also coexist with the ruins of the later
social and political project, frustrated in part as diverse international
circumstances saw the country’s economic development freeze and then stagnate.
“Architecture tells you about people,
their needs, their suffering and hopes. In Havana it tells you a lot about the
loss of faith in the future, and also of individual and collective memories,”
remarks Carlos Garaicoa, one of Cuba’s foremost contemporary artists whose
practice since the 1990s has focussed on the disconnect between the hopes and
promises generated by the political idealism of the 1959 Cuban revolution and
the realities of day-to-day life in a broadly hostile political environment.
Born in Havana in 1967, Garaicoa grew up
under Castro’s regime and witnessed the economic impact of the 1962 U.S.
financial and trade embargo on Cuba and then much later the fall of the former
USSR with the subsequent dwindling of financial support to the Castro regime.
The multi-disciplinary artist says his
country’s political situation marked his work from the very beginning, when he
first took a camera to create provocative commentaries that reflected his
frustrations with the crumbling modernist ideal, using the architectural ruins he
saw in Havana as a starting point to reflect on his country’s failing utopian
dream. “As I was raised in Old Havana I was of course interested in the shapes
of the ruins, in the idea of that sadly ephemeral city, full of symbols and
political statements and at the same time crumbling and leaving empty spaces
all around us,” the artist says.
While Havana’s streets were the artist’s
first subjects, studios, and exhibition spaces, his practice quickly evolved from
a black and white documentary to a more creative interpretation as he started
to intervene in the spaces, for example using stretched string to recreate the
outlines of lost structures.
The artist came to international
attention with a work titled Continuity of Somebody’s Architecture for the 2002
Documenta 11, in Kassel, Germany, in which he departed from the physical ruins
of buildings constructed mostly between the late 19th and early 20th centuries
to focus on buildings built after Fidel Castro had come to power, which he
described as an “aborted architecture which failed both in its useful and aesthetic
purposes.”
With the decline of communism in Europe,
he points out that the Cuban construction industry collapsed leaving, “Hundreds
of unfinished, disregarded, or momentously forgotten buildings” adding “The
encounter with these places evokes a rare sensation; they are not the ruins of
a luminous past, but of a present of inability. We face an architecture that
has never been completed, poor in its incompletion, proclaimed ‘Ruin’ before
its existence. It is a true image of a ruin by abandonment; I will call it ruin
of (the) future,” the artist wrote at the time.
Working with an architect and a team of
model makers, Garaicoa’s Continuity of Somebody’s Architecture provided a model
of what the finished buildings could have looked like, contrasting them with
the corresponding black-and-white photographs of the current reality.
In his more recent works, Garaicoa continues
to highlight the deterioration of his beloved city by rendering missing
buildings in crystal or transforming detailed photographs of sidewalks (some
with chewing-gum stains) in front of the formerly grand department stores into
jacquard-loom tapestries that visitors can walk across. “There is an intention,
a story as you say, behind the materials that I use. There is a search for
materials whenever they try to answer certain questions. In my work the story
comes first and the material comes second. For example, I have chosen different
materials such as papers, thread, wax, glass, when trying to speak of
fragility, of the idea of crisis,” he explains.
Garaicoa has also extended his
investigation of social and political developments beyond Havana and he now
splits his time between the Cuban capital and the Spanish capital as he also
has a studio in Madrid. But it is clear his heart is very much in the urban
fabric of Havana and the societal challenges.
“In term of new architecture, not much
is happening in Havana today beyond new hotels. On the other hand stopping old
buildings from crumbling, that’s a titanic work,” he remarks adding that these building
tell both “a story of crumbling and resistance (and) a story of decrepitude and
stubbornness to stand no matter what… Architecture’s decay sheds light on the
breaks of society and reality; as well as about the needs of the city to
rebuild itself as a new space.”
First published on KEYYES.com (October 2018)
First published on KEYYES.com (October 2018)